Why 92% of SEOs suspect their competitors buy links

Send me an e-mail

Nearly every SEO believes the competition is cheating. In a survey by Editorial.Link, 92% of SEOs and link builders said they think rivals are buying backlinks — a figure that says as much about the anxiety in the industry as about the practice itself. So is paid link building a real edge, or an expensive way to get penalised?

Why the suspicion runs so deep

In cut-throat niches like finance and gambling, the temptation to buy an advantage is constant, and when a competitor's rankings jump overnight it is easy to assume the worst. Visible, sudden results feed the belief that someone paid for them.

The real risks of buying backlinks

Google's guidelines are explicit about paid links, and breaking them is costly. Sites caught buying links risk manual or algorithmic penalties and steep drops in visibility. The spend is rarely recovered, because any ranking gain tends to be short-lived, and the reputational and search damage can linger long after the next major update.

Why SEOs still do it

Organic link building is slow: it takes real content and real relationships. Paid links promise the same outcome now, and that immediacy is enough to tempt people despite the downside.

What the numbers actually show

The data tempers the panic. Only 12.6% of sites approached are willing to sell a link at all; most simply ignore the request. Where links do change hands, niche edits average around $361.44 and guest posts about $77.80, and the practice concentrates in the same competitive niches where suspicion is highest. Lower-DR sites are the most likely sellers, usually because they lack a sustainable revenue model and treat link sales as income.

The fallout for sellers

Sites that sell links frequently see sharp traffic losses after Google updates, along with penalties and a damaged reputation in their field — a reminder that the risk sits on both sides of the transaction.

When the disavow tool is worth it

Google's John Mueller has said large disavow lists are usually unnecessary, and in practice 69% of SEOs never touch the tool. It still earns its place when your profile has accumulated genuinely harmful, low-quality links, or as part of recovering from a penalty. Editorial.Link's link-type classifier can help here, flagging whether backlinks read as paid or organic so you can verify quality and protect your profile.

Build links you never have to disavow

The sustainable path is the unglamorous one: create content reputable sites actually want to cite, build real relationships with peers and industry voices, and verify your profile rather than gambling on it. It is slower than buying links — and it is the only version that survives the next algorithm update.